deconstruction – The Lyrical Realist

Keeping Faith in God When Religion Has Let You Down

Why I Kissed Churching Goodbye Pt. 2

Posted on February 9, 2026June 6, 2026 by Elizabeth Matthews

Renewing Our Minds

[Ahh, sniffle sniffle! A stubborn illness, paired with mandatory overtime at my job, interfered with my writing goals last week. Upward and onward, eh?]

Losing My Religion

The concept of spiritual deconstruction seems to be all over my YouTube feed, in the list of podcasts I browse, and the bookshelves I peruse. It’s quite a contrast to how I felt around 2012, when I became engulfed in what I considered to be a “spiritual battle,” as a young mom, a lay minister, and a Bible college student. When I began wrestling with my spiritual beliefs, I knew no such terms as exvangelical or recovering fundamentalist, no movement called “Empty the Pews,” or “The Rise of the Nones.”

I just thought I was damned. I felt like the lyrics in an R.E.M. song:

“That’s me in the corner/that’s me in the spotlight, losing my religion.”

. . . however small my corner and my spotlight may have been.

I felt alone. The Christians I talked to thought I was an idiot—and a blasphemous one, at that—for struggling in my faith. The non-Christians I encountered thought I was an idiot for being a Christian in the first place.

A Dark Night of the Soul

I couldn’t not believe in God, for my experiences with God had been too real. God had whispered love to me through the treetops, met me in the lonely places and the sleepless night, thrummed through my soul, opened my eyes to joys that made me weep and beauty that made me weak in the knees. God . . . directed me to friends and books, poems and scriptures just when I needed them. God alighted on my shoulder like a bird and sung to me, sung through me. I know this sounds like nonsense. I don’t know how to explain these sublime experiences in humdrum words.

But my experiences with a fractured church that chose its own emphases—often different from what Christ taught—and devoured its members, especially those who cared the most and worked the hardest—those were very real, very visceral, too.

My questions went deeper than church, though. “Let God be true, and every man a liar” (Romans 3:4), I thought. It was my favorite comeback to the common excuse, “I can’t believe in God, because some people are hypocrites.” But that argument couldn’t help me with a theological framework that made no sense. I didn’t struggle to believe in God or even in miracles, but I did struggle to believe that the God presented by the Bible and my fundamentalist-evangelical church, was good. I didn’t fear there was no heaven or hell. Rather, I feared being consigned to a very real hell, because I felt that I could not obey “the first and greatest commandment” which is to “love the Lord your God with all your heart, soul, mind, and strength” (Matt 22:37-38).

Respect, I could do. Memorizing scripture verses, showing up to every church function, and speaking the evangelical lingo were all things I had been doing well since I was in my cradle. But how could I, with any integrity, love or even feign love, for the Old Testament God who had ordered the slaying of Canaanite men, women, and children—even infants, even pets? Or the God who had turned Lot’s wife into a pillar of salt for glancing behind at the violent destruction of her homeland and her relatives (Genesis 19:26), but venerates Lot as a “righteous man” (2 Peter 2:7-8) . . . for what? For his rampant drunkenness and incest with his daughters (Genesis 19:30-38)?

Feigning love for that God made me feel like a worm, like a victim who keeps crawling back to her abuser, to build up his ego and gaslight herself for having a problem with his cruelty.

Anyway, so much of this Bible nonsense had nothing to do with the God I knew through my own spiritual experiences. It made me feel I had been deceived, either by the God I knew and thought I loved, or by the Bible writers and the Bible-idolizing Church I had entrusted with my faith.

I wanted to love God, but how could I love—or believe I was loved—by a God who had seemed to sanction the world’s very tilt against women? There is plenty in the Bible to suggest that treating women like sub-human commodities to be traded doesn’t ruffle God’s feathers at all, though he does bother to comment on ‘important’ issues like how the tassels on a men’s prayer cloths should look. How could I love a God whose words through Paul and Peter about female submission and male headship have been used to excuse domestic abuse and oppressive discrimination. Domestic abuse like that which terrorized my childhood and left me recoiling from masculinity—and recoiling from myself, horrified at my own femaleness, at the same time?

Why couldn’t Christians have real conversations about concerns like these, I wondered, without someone—usually me—getting accused of having a “deeeeeeemon”?

Furthermore, how could I love the medieval Catholic God selling indulgences when it wasn’t in bed with corrupt kings. How could I honor the God of the invading rapists and slave drivers, Columbus and Cortez? How could I identify with the ‘Christian’ founding father, Thomas Jefferson, keeping slaves while he wrote “all men are created equal.” Taking sexual advantage of Sally Hemmings, a slave, with no legal rights, while his humiliated wife wept over the corpse of her own child upstairs? How could I identify myself with complacent ‘Christian’ America whites starving indigenous people on reservations? With missionaries stealing indigenous children to abuse them in boarding schools? How tout, “Jesus Saves and Transforms!” after so many ‘good’ ‘Christian’ white folks refused to share a drinking fountain with black people? How and why should we identify with everyday ‘Christian’ German folks who could suddenly be convinced to take part in the horrors of Kristallnacht, because some loud-mouthed politician had convinced them that punishing a scapegoat ethnic group would Make Germany Great Again?

(See, what is paltry, I can easily describe in paltry words.)

Why couldn’t the Church have a meaningful dialogue about issues like these, without doubling down and making excuses. Why couldn’t they follow their own formula for “salvation” and, instead of growling, “Radical Leftist!” at anyone hoping to see better than dog-eat-dog from the Church, expressing some humility? Some repentance? Isn’t that what Christians are supposed to do? Instead of refusing to search their own hearts and their own history and blaming the victim for the uncomfortable shame of the victimizer?

I could get my mind around an imperious and all-powerful God who could very well wreak all kind of injustice any time he wanted to. Sure. But could I get my heart around that? That is, could I love it with all my heart, soul, mind, and strength?

Not a chance.

Enter Deconstruction

I tried ‘getting saved’ again. I tried getting baptized a third time. I read books. I sought counsel.

Then I tried major depression. It was a whole thing.

I came to the conclusion I could not avoid having a relationship with God, as I believed in God, and believed God was everywhere. I did not mind this much, for I also felt a winsome tugging on my heart, as if from the Holy spirit, even as my heart was curdling into hatred . . .

But neither the unavoidability nor the winsomeness was true of the church. I entered into a “wilderness period.” I had to spend some time away from the expectations, the traditions, and the loud voices raised in discord—to discover . . . the countenance of God. So did Moses. So did the ancient Israelites. So did Elijah. So did Jesus. So did Paul. Forty days and Forty nights in the wilderness. Forty years in the desert. Three years in Arabia. It was good for them; I’m not above it.

I determined that since I was going to have a relationship with God, it was going to have to be an honest one. Not one in which I simply said, “Oh well,” about all the harmful and nonsensical aspects of institutionalized Christianity. I had already played the part of the submissive Christian, where I said, “No, I don’t like this, and no, it doesn’t make any sense—and it actually seems to be producing evil, but never mind. I’m going to keep reinforcing this stuff, because this is my religion. Now, let me get back to ironing my husband’s shirts.”

And I think that was a good prayer, for the time. But we are not meant to stagnate. There came a time to move forward to a new prayer:

“God, if I am to know and to love you, I must really know you. In spirit and in truth. And if I am to follow you, if I am to be some sort of ambassador for you, then I must know that what I am representing is not false and will not cause harm others created in your image. I can set this contingency, because I believe that you are good and true, and that whatever is false, whatever is cruel, is not of you. If you are only false and cruel, you are not worth my time. But I have seen you and known your goodness, and I purpose myself to learn about experience you more and not let the hearsay of others get in my way.

The Deconstructionist Wave

If any of this resonates with you, because you have felt the tectonic plates of belief and culture shifting under your feet, you certainly aren’t alone.

In 2024, the Barna Group found that 42% of American adults had “deconstructed the faith of their youth (Barna Group 2024”). And this followed reports that for the last 20 years had indicated a major decline in American Christianity. In 2015, Pew Research Center found the percentage of Americans identifying as Christians decreased eight percentage points between 2007 and 2014. Accounting for general population growth and the time and margins of error, PEW estimated this drop in Christian affiliation of between 2.8 and 7.8 million (Pew Research 2015). During the same period, the number of Americans unaffiliated with any religion (the ‘Nones’) grew from 19 million to 56 million, making the unaffiliated the fastest growing religious group in America (PRRI 2016). More recently, Christianity Today and CNN found that “the rate of self-identified Democrats giving up on church in their 20s-50s doubled from the end of Barack Obama’s presidency to the end of Trump’s” first term, indicating that American Christianity’s tendency to hold conservative political values as a litmus test for faith has spurred many to deconstruct the faith of their youth (Christianity Today 2023, CNN 2024).

Does this mean that deconstruction and/or progressive ideologies are gutting the church?

Well, don’t panic. While faith deconstruction does sound a lot like faith destruction, Barna’s research found only one percentage point of difference between spiritually deconstructed Christians who continue in the faith, and those who do not. Their report simplifies it like this: “more than one-third of committed, church-going Christians relate to the idea of having deconstructed their faith” (Barna Group 2024).

A more relevant question might actually be, “How can this overhaul refocus and revitalize the Church? The church isn’t dying. It’s being reformed. Remade in places you’d least expect. People are celebrating the Way of Jesus on barstools in pubs and in online communities and recovery groups and in Superbowl Commercials and on Instagram posts made by angry-looking women with nose-rings who know the Bible better than the average charismatic preacher who’s about to be caught soliciting sexual favors next week . . .

We’re going to be ok. As I have heard Nadia Bolz-Weber say, ‘the Church’ may lose some real estate holdings, some official numbers and official influence, some universities and media outlets. But people are still going to be gathering around tables, breaking bread, embracing our shared humanity, and recounting the stories of Jesus. And that’s what we’re really about, after all.

Defining Deconstruction

So, what do you think of this deconstruction we’ve been hearing so much about? Is it a fad? A bandwagon? A buzz-phrase? Is it the product of “liberal indoctrination” in universities? Is it the fulfillment of 2 Timothy 3:1-5 and Matthew 24:10-25, which predict mass apostasy “in the last days”? I’ve heard all of these, and I will deal with them in more depth in later posts. But let’s begin by simply defining it and explaining what it means in practice. (Please allow me a minute to sound pedantic—there’s no other way to describe this concept!)

Deconstruction did not begin as a religious concept, but as a method for analyzing meaning in Western society. It was introduced by the postmodernist philosopher Jacques Derrida in the late 1960s. Originally focused on unpacking meaning within the construct of language, deconstructionism calls into question the constructs that societies treat as ultimate reality that are really just figments of our cultural imaginations.

Think of a society that accepts one sex or race as inferior to another, without any serious thought or scientific evidence to back this up.
Think of assuming the best way to get rain to your thirsty crops is to sacrifice a dead animal to a statue of a bull.

These were/are normal attitudes within certain social constructs. But I don’t think we would agree that they represent timeless, incontrovertible truths we are obligated to abide by today!

Similarly, think of a culture defining success as militarism, conquest, or wealth. Imagine this concept is presented as fact or reality—simply the way things are, world without end. But clearly, other ways of defining success do exist. For example, one could measure a civilization’s success by the beautiful artworks it produces. One could measure societal success by the overall health and longevity of its members. Or by its scientific discoveries.

Deconstruction would allow members of that society to get at the roots of their narrow definition of success—to reveal the flustered man behind the curtains pulling the levers. And once they have realized their ‘ultimate reality’ to be as tenuous as a spider’s web, they will be freed to consider new value systems that might better serve their people, and their neighbors.

A Means, Not an End

You can probably see how this philosophical approach lends itself very well to the consideration of religion and its influence on societies. Deconstructionism asks us to consider the origins and meanings of tribal assumptions and social habits we’ve been taught to take for granted. As Christians, we might even think of faith deconstruction as being “transformed by the renewing [our] minds” (Romans 12:2b). Yeah, we get stuck in a rut sometimes. We may get in the habit of overemphasizing this, neglecting that . . . we need to stop and reevaluate our faith once in a while. We need to renew our minds.

Deconstruction is not the end-all. Like any philosophical tool, it can be misapplied or overused. But it also has useful applications that deepen our understanding of ourselves and why we believe and live as we do. It can help us to jettison what was harmful in the past and to move forward.

Is Deconstruction Dangerous?

Deconstructionism comes across as a threat to those who find comfort in tradition and benefit from the status quo. But can we really argue that deconstruction is an adversary of truth? The pursuit of truth must welcome curiosity, and any truth worth devoting our lives to, should be able withstand scrutiny.

Socrates said, “The unexamined life is not worth living.” How do you feel about giving your life to an unexamined faith?

Take courage!

If you believe that God loves you and “no one can pluck [you] from [his] hand” (John 10:28), and if you believe “God is over all and through all and in all” (Ephesians 4:6)—also that “Christ is all and in all (Colossians 3:11)—then shouldn’t you also have confidence that as you explore your spirituality, you do so with the comfort of Divine presence within and all around you?

You get to strip off the dusty old husks–the packaging of religion, about which the Church is content to sing and preach–and get to the real, nourishing kernels within. Sure, now it may be harder to find a congregation in which you don’t feel like an oddball . . . But can we agree that’s a small price for realizing you are the temple?

You will be the administrator of your faith, you the interpreter of Divine communications—in whatever form God chooses to send them. As the prophet Jeremiah wrote: “I will put my law within them, and I will write it on their hearts. And I will be their God, and they shall be my people” (Jeremiah 31:33b NIV).

Why I Kissed Churching Goodbye

Posted on January 27, 2026January 27, 2026 by Elizabeth Matthews

When Loving God Means Leaving the Church

Are You Wrestling With Aspects of Your Fundamentalist/Evangelical Christian Tradition?

Are you a church worker who feels like you’re on an endless merry-go-round of purposeless church activity? Does it seem that all this activity fails to yield the positive transformation it promises you or the world?

Have you wondered why the Church seems to eat its own, devouring leaders and faithful laypeople with endless work and criticism, shame and fear?

Do you feel dishonest trying to convince nonbelievers that your religion has all the answers to set the world right—when you know its people are just as messed up as anyone else and its institutions just as greedy and corrupt?

Are you a devout believer who can’t help wondering why the Church of Jesus, who was a friend to “the least of these,” has stood complicit in genocide, slavery, misogyny, and racism throughout history? Why it often courts the grossly wealthy and blames the poor?

Are you tired of your faith being reduced to a few hot-button political issues, like opposing abortion and the LGBTQ+ community, which Jesus never spoke against? In fact, do you wonder why Christ-ians are more concerned with what Paul and Moses taught than with what Christ taught?

Let’s go deeper.

Maybe your struggle isn’t just with church but with the whole framework of your beliefs, and you wonder . . .

Why you’re supposed to forgive, but God gets to hold a grudge for eternity—against everyone—over a piece of fruit?
Why God only forgives those who confess and repent, but you’re supposed to forgive those who harm you and are unrepentant about it?
Why God slaughtered entire Old Testament villages and then told you to be gentle, long-suffering, and self-controlled?
How we even got the Bible in the first place? Who got to decide what was in it? And why do we have to take their word for it?
Similarly, how did God control the Biblical authors so that no trace of their human bias or ignorance entered our ‘inerrant’ texts?
- Did he turn them into zombies?
- What about freewill? Many of our churches preach that freewill is so sacred that all humanity has to suffer and die, and potentially be tortured for eternity just so freewill can exist.
  - So . . . God won’t suspend freewill to prevent a six-year-old girl from being sex trafficked, but God will suspend it so that, for instance, Samuel can write infallibly about the exploits of David’s “mighty men”?
Did God similarly suspend the free will of all Bible interpreters and translators over millennia . . . so that no trace of their human fallibility entered the sacred text, either?

Why we’re letting our understanding of history and science be dictated by ancient men with far less information than we have now.?
Have you ever thought maybe the supernatural events and historical factuality of Scripture emphasized in your church isn’t the point . . .
- and that when we emphasize those, we are missing some wonderful spiritual truths and moral teachings that could really help our world?

Asking Questions is Scary Business

When you’ve been indoctrinated to believe any deviation from church consensus is punishable by eternal hell, it can be incredibly scary to begin asking questions. On the other hand, you may sense, as I did, that our intellect and integrity will die if we don’t reckon with these issues.

I am Elizabeth, a deconstructing Christian dedicated to keeping the faith. I write because I’ve wrestled with questions like the ones above. I know there’s a lot on the line there.

If you wrestle through those questions with an open mind, do you end up losing heaven? Do you lose your morals?
Do you lose identity? How about hope? Does that go, too?
What about connection? It’s likely if you were all-in on the faith, veering from the herd may means you risk losing your entire community.
And what about purpose? You’ve been raised to believe you have a great purpose in the cosmic battle between Good and Evil. What’s your place in the universe now?

I’ve been there. I am there. I write to come alongside you on your path.

A Guide? How About a Companion?

I call this blog “A Deconstructionist Guide to Keeping the Faith” only because it’s catchy. I don’t consider myself to have reached some plane from which I’m entitled to “guide” anybody. Unlike my former Evangelical self, I won’t claim authority or promise certainty. But I give only what is mine to give, and that is my witness.

So, moving forward, I will be posting once a week, typically on Saturday mornings, to share my journey with you. We will be exploring . . .

Some of the questions listed above, and more.
Perspectives on scripture and doctrine that you may not have considered before.
Authors, musicians, and content creators who can help us along the journey.
Discussion on what’s next. How do we build meaningful spirituality post-deconstruction?
Current events and how to respond to them in light of Jesus’ teachings.
Observations, epiphanies, meditations, and prayers
And finally, a healthy dose of the Lyrical as we deal with the Real.
- Let us reclaim some of the wonder we have lost to disillusionment. Faith has branches in the gritty ‘real world,’ but it is rooted in profound mystery.

When Loving God Meant Leaving the Church

I used to preach and teach in the grand old tradition of quasi-fundamentalist Evangelicalism. For years, I led worship, sang, and played keyboards. I hosted prayer meetings, taught Sunday School, and led youth. I believed I was called. I pursued ministry education and fulfilled the requirements for credentialing in my denomination, the Assemblies of God.

But the deeper I embedded myself in faith, study, and ministry, the more glaring appeared the holes in our theological system. The more obvious the inconsistencies in our doctrines and the discrepancies between our stated beliefs and lived priorities. As I kept working in the church, I grew increasingly disillusioned with the fact that we just seemed to be amusing ourselves with insular church activities. I grieved our stubborn insistence on what I considered religious nonessentials:

Think . . .

Styles of worship
Debates about creation/evolution, miracles, and the rapture
Biblical literalism/inerrancy
Purity culture and gender roles
Doctrinal statements, and
Political loyalty tests.

I argued that our Christian community’s misplaced priorities ensured that we could not connect with spiritually hungry people in a modern, democratized world. It seemed that for every silly churchism we made essential, we were obscuring the real, hope-giving, and life-changing stuff of the Gospel.

At last, I could not reconcile common church attitudes and practices with the Christ around whom, supposedly, our faith revolved. What? Shame the victim and coddle the abuser? Give the best seat to wealthy church members, then overwork and criticize the poor ones? If the Church, with all its grand claims, could do no better than the rest of the dog-eat-dog world, what was the point in adhering to it?

A free ticket to heaven? A social club? Was that what this was really all about?

Why I Am Keeping the Faith

But I am here because I believe there is a point to keeping the teachings of Jesus, and I believe the core of those teachings is as beautiful and life-giving as ever. I just had to peel back the layers of Churchism to get at that beauty.

Like many, as I deconstructed my faith, I found my problem was not with God or with spirituality, but simply that my faith was outgrowing the container I used for these things. The container of fundamentalist Evangelicalism was beginning to limit and confine my connection with God, though it had once facilitated it.

As a good friend of mine says, “Even the term Christian has become too fraught.” It brings up connotations of prudes and bigots, televangelist grifters, and comfortable, white retirees crying “Persecution! Reverse-Racism!” every time a white Christian doesn’t receive favoritism. Cringe.

I prefer the term Jesus-follower, for it denotes a measurable goal to follow the teacher of great tenets like:

“You shall love your neighbor as yourself” (Mark 12:31 NRSV).
“So in everything, do to others what you would have them do to you, for this sums up the Law and the Prophets” (Matt 7:12 NIV).
“You know that the rulers of the Gentiles lord it over them, and their great ones are tyrants over them. It will not be so among you, but whoever wishes to be great among you must be your servant . . . just as the Son of Man came not to be served but to serve and to give his life a ransom for many” (Matt 20:25a-26, 28 NRSV).
“‘Truly I tell you, whatever you did for one of the least of these brothers and sisters of mine, you did for me.’ . . . Truly I tell you, just as you did not do it to one of the least of these, you did not do it to me’” (Matt 25:40b, 45b NIV)

Jesus modeled inclusion of the outcast and downtrodden. He offered tangible care for the poor and sick, because he saw the value in everyone. He didn’t settle for the mundane pursuit of comfort, wealth, and power; he pointed us to something higher.

Spiritual Deconstruction Does Not Equal Spiritual Destruction

If you are wrestling with questions you can neither shake nor answer according to your religious framework, the discomfort might just be growing pains. I have heard a bit of outcry from the Fundy-Evangelical segment complaining that deconstruction is demonically inspired to destroy the church in the last days. They equate spiritual deconstruction with a full departure from faith in God. Of course, it is true that for many, faith deconstruction has been an off-ramp from theism.

But allow me to posit another way to think of faith deconstruction.

Maybe it’s about maturing. And spiritual maturing is a choice. The path is there, but no one’s going to make you take it. Are you ready to shed the manmade baggage and take a conscientious look to determine what about your faith is “true . . . noble . . .right . . . pure . . . [and] lovely” (Phillipians 4:8 NIV)?

If you are worried your struggles mean you are losing a cherished relationship with God. I remind you that your commitment to spiritual integrity does not signal that there is nothing where your faith used to be! Instead, it indicates that a lot of chaff is about to get blown away!

Stuff just got Real.

I want to close by telling you the one thing I most needed to hear when I feared my faith was unraveling:

Deconstruction does not have to mean destruction.

Spiritual deconstruction can mean honing, rather than disowning, your faith!

Moving away from organized Christianity has meant that I now interact in faith, rather than in certainty, with a God whose shape I no longer try to define or control. I find God more mysterious, sure, but also more loving, creative, and expansive than I did before. I found that it’s more important to trust in the goodness and constancy of God than in the infallibility of human institutions. If one of these is eroding my trust in God, I’ll leave the institution and keep God.

I also have a greater focus on what we can and should do to better the lives of our fellow humans. And I have a greater sense of purpose to interact humbly and justly with this earth and all its creatures.

So, I finish with encouragement that faith deconstruction need not be a dead end where you drop off who you used to be.

It is also an open door to who you are becoming.

Welcome, dear Community! I look forward to growing with you!

Next week:     Why I Kissed Churching Goodbye, Pt.2—A deep dive into what faith deconstruction means and how it’s reshaping the Church for the better.